Se hai bisogno urgente del nostro intervento puoi contattarci al numero 370 14 89 430
Languages cannot have a conventional agreement at all, as in Japanese or Malay; barely one, as in English; a small amount, as in spoken French; a moderate amount, such as in Greek or Latin; or a large quantity, as in Swahili. In this in-depth study of the Chamorro Agreement (Malayo-Polynesian), Chung initiates some aspects of the standard minimalist treatment of chords and refines them, suggesting that what we consider to be an agreement should actually be divided into two distinct relationships: one that is responsible for the inclusion of two syntactic elements in a formal relationship and the other responsible for actual morphological covariance (if observed). There is also a consensus between pronouns and precursors. Examples of this can be found in English (although English pronouns mainly follow natural sex and not grammatical sex): compared to English, Latin is an example of a very curved language. The consequences for the agreement are therefore: in the name sentences, the adjectives do not show a concordance with the noun, although the pronouns do. z.B. a szép k-nyveitekkel “with your beautiful books” (“szép”: nice): the suffixes of the plural, the possessive “your” and the fall marker “with” are marked only on the name. One of the first large-scale typological surveys of the universalities, trends and hierarchies of the brand in the behavioral behavior of transverse deafness. The thesis that the processes established by chord markers and those that produce pronouns are similar in themselves (a thesis that is echoed in many recent work on climate doubling). “Agreement” is the grammatical phenomenon in which the form of a post, such as the name “horses,” requires a second point in the sentence, such as the verb “galop” in some form, i.e. the “galop” must correspond to “horses” in the number. Although concordance phenomena are some of the most familiar and well-studied aspects of grammar, some fundamental questions have rarely been asked, let alone answered.
This book develops a theory of the processes of concordance found in language, and studies why verbs agree with subjects in person, adjectives correspond in number and sex, but not the person, and the names do not agree at all. Explaining these differences leads to a theory that can be applied to all parts of the language and all languages. A proposal on case interaction, agreement, tension and licensing for subjects, based on data from both adult language and language learning. A complete theory of the agreement, which is set in a hpSG/LFG hybrid framework. One of the main empirical questions is how to resolve coherence with gender-specific connectors (see also the coordination resolution of agreement). At the beginning of modern times, there was an agreement for the second person, which singularus all the verbs in the current form, as well as in the past some usual verbs. It was usually in the shape-east, but -st and t also occurred. Note that this does not affect endings for other people and numbers. Another characteristic is the agreement in entries that have different forms for different sexes: a rare type of chord that phonologically copies parts of the head instead of agreeing with a grammatical category.
 For example, in Bainouk: If you refer to general groups or names, you must pay attention to the number and gender agreement. Changers, Steven and Larisa Zlatié. 2003. The many faces of the agreement. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information. In the case of verbs, a gender agreement is less widespread, although it may still occur. In the French past, for example, the former work of the participants corresponds, in certain circumstances, to the subject or an object (for more details, see compound past).