Se hai bisogno urgente del nostro intervento puoi contattarci al numero 370 14 89 430
Arguments  in court proceedings are admissible only to the extent that prosecutors and defence can agree that the accused will plead guilty to certain counts and the prosecutor will drop the rest. [Citation required] Although this is not a plea, the defence may, in Crown court cases, ask the judge for an indication of the likely maximum sentence that would be imposed if the accused pleads guilty.   There is of course a difference between crushing members if you refuse to confess, or an additional year`s imprisonment if you refuse to confess, but the difference is gradual, not friendly. Advocacy and torture are a constraint. Like the Europeans of the Middle Ages, the Americans set up a system of procedure that was condemned without adjudication.  Arguments are extremely difficult in civil legal systems. Unlike common law systems, civil law systems have no recourse if the defendant confesses; a confession is in evidence, but the prosecutor is not exempt from the requirement to present a full case. A court may decide that an accused is innocent, even if he or she has made a full confession. Unlike common law systems, prosecutors in civil law countries may not have the power to drop or reduce costs after a case has been filed, and in some countries their power to drop or reduce costs before a case is filed is limited, making oral arguments impossible.
Since the 1980s, many civil law nations have adapted their systems to allow for oral arguments.  The Federal Code of Criminal Procedure provides for two main types of pleas. An agreement of 11 (c) (1) (B) does not bind the court; the prosecutor`s recommendation is merely advisory and the accused cannot withdraw his plea if the court decides to impose a sentence other than that provided for by the agreement. However, an agreement of 11 (c) (1) (C) binds the court as soon as the court accepts the agreement. Where such an agreement is proposed, the Tribunal may reject it if it does not agree with the proposed judgment, since the defendant has the opportunity, in this case, to withdraw his means.  Yes, in an “Alford” plea, an accused can make an admission of guilt while asserting his innocence. This requires them to intelligently conclude that it is in their best interest and that they want to retain the advantage of the bargain. When I receive a plea, I always ask two questions: in other cases, formal arguments are limited in Pakistan, but the prosecutor has the power to drop a case or charge in a case, and in practice, this is often the case, in return for an accused who has pleaded guilty to a lesser charge. The sentence, which is the court`s only privilege, is not tried. [Citation required] indicates that the accused accepts the charges against him. The accused may plead guilty, all counts, some of the charges, or a lesser charge if one is proposed. An admission of guilt leads to the conviction of this charge with the same effect as a jury conviction.
If an accused pleads guilty to only one part of the charges without a plea, the case continues on the other counts. If the court finds that the evidence presented is not sufficient to support the indictment or if an application for a decision without substantial consideration of a case is filed in violation of the requirements of Georgia`s Code of Criminal Procedure, it must refer the case to the Crown.